FEATURE
Literacy and AV
Kathryn Wilson, MA, CCC-SLP, LSLS Cert.AVT®
Amazing strides have been made to screen newborns for the
presence of hearing loss and to provide early intervention to
infants and toddlers who are deaf or hard of hearing in the 21st
century. The benefits of early identification and early intervention are
well documented. Research suggests that speech, language, and vocabulary
outcomes and social-emotional development are significantly
better than for children who are identified later (Yoshinaga-Itano 1995,
2004; Yoshinaga-Itano and Sedy 2000; Yoshinaga-Itano et al. 1998).
In this new era of early identification and early intervention
many children are developing communication and language
skills in close parallel to their hearing peers. However some
children require intensive and specialized intervention to close
educationally significant language-learning gaps. It is important
to understand the impact of delayed language on academic
success and to identify and implement effective home and
school practices for this population.
Achieving Academic Success:
Considerations for Children who
are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Kathryn Wilson, MA, CCC-SLP, LSLS Cert. AVT
There is clear evidence from the literature regarding the robust
relationship between oral language and success in reading
(Katz et al. 1981; Mann et al. 1984; National Institute of Child
Health and Human Development 2005; Shankweiler et al.
1979; Snow et al. 1994; Storch and Whitehurst 2002). It has
been said that “spoken language is the engine that pulls the
reading-writing-literacy train.” Children with language delays
are particularly at risk for problems related to success in reading
and subsequent academic failure (Ling 1989; Robertson
2000). Simply stated, in order for children who are deaf or
hard of hearing to achieve academic success they must be able
to read well and in order to read well, these children must
develop the requisite spoken language skills. Unfortunately, far
too many children are forced to begin the formal reading
process before the language gap is closed. The result is often a
student whose language-learning gaps continue to expand and
one who finds reading difficult and frustrating.
For children with significant language delays who are at
risk of academic failure the development of a long-term, multiyear
plan is recommended. This model first introduced by
Walker (2004) includes the child’s present level of performance
as well as projected rate of progress in language and vocabulary
for each year of the plan until the gap is closed. The long-term
plan describes school services and the amount of time needed
daily or weekly at school to make sufficient progress toward
goals. In addition to changes in school programming and professional
practices the role of parents in closing the gap is critical.
A long-term plan also defines parental roles and responsibilities
in terms of participation in weekly parent sessions and
amount of recommended carryover time outside of the school
environment. Subsequent to development of a long-term plan,
parents and professionals must implement evidence-based
practices that contribute to success in reading and literacy.
Research has demonstrated that reading aloud to children
of all ages is the most important factor in raising a reader
(Trelease, 2006). It is hard
to imagine any other single practice
that yields so many benefits. The following list of benefits from
The Read Aloud Handbook authored by Jim Trelease clearly
demonstrates that reading aloud is an essential practice for all
children and especially those with educationally significant language-
learning-gaps:
• Reading aloud improves vocabulary
• Reading aloud promotes oral language development
• Reading aloud increases attention span
• Reading aloud increases listening comprehension
• Reading aloud increases reading comprehension
• Reading aloud results in increased performance on standardized
tests
The Read Aloud Handout is a highly recommended resource for parents
and professionals alike to learn more about the benefits, stages,
and strategies for reading aloud on a daily basis.
In summary, the learner must know the spoken version of the language
that is to be read and written. Children who are deaf or hard of
hearing can and must learn to read well to achieve true academic success.
The key is closing the language-learning gap. Two tried-and-true
practices for this population include the development of a long-term
plan and daily read-aloud. The long-term plan is essential so that all
involved in the child’s education understand the end goal and the factors necessary for achieving the goal. Secondly, adopting the practice
of daily read aloud is an easy and highly effective method for achieving
high levels of language, literacy, reading and writing. We can all
contribute to the present and future success of children who are deaf
or hard of hearing. Pick up a book and read!
References
R.B. Katz, D. Shankweiler, and I.Y. Liberman. Memory for item order and
phonetic recoding in the beginning reader. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology 1981;32:474–84.
D. Ling. Foundations of spoken language for hearing-impaired children.
Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and
Hard of Hearing. 1989.
V.A. Mann, D. Shankweiler, and S. Smith. The association between comprehension
of spoken sentences and early reading ability: The role of phonetic
representation. Journal of Child Language 1984;2:627–43.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care
Research Network. Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the
transition to reading. Developmental Psychology 2005;41(2):428–42.
L. Robertson. Literacy learning for children who are deaf or hard of hearing.
Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and
Hard of Hearing. 2000.
D. Shankweiler, I.Y. Liberman, L.S. Mark, C.A. Fowler, and F.W. Fischer. The
speech code and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Learning and Memory 1979;5:531–45.
C.E. Snow, P.O. Tabors, P.A. Nicholson, and B.F. Kurland. SHELL: Oral language
and early literacy skills in kindergarten and first-grade children.
Journal of Research in Childhood Education,1994;10(1):37–48.
S.A. Storch and G.J. Whitehurst. Oral language and code-related precursors
to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental
Psychology 2002;38, 934–47.
J. Trelease. The Read Aloud Handbook. Penguin. 2006.
B. Walker. Mainstream module. Presented at the University of North
Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. 2004.
C. Yoshinaga-Itano. Efficacy of early identification and intervention. Seminars
in Hearing 1995;16:115–120.
C. Yoshinaga-Itano. Levels of evidence: universal newborn hearing screening
(UNHS) and early hearing detection and intervention systems (EHDI).
Journal of Communication Disorders, 2004;37:451–65.
C. Yoshinaga-Itano and A.L. Sedey. Early speech development in children who
are deaf or hard-of-hearing: Interrelationships with language and hearing.
In: C. Yoshinaga-Itano and A.L. Sedey (Eds.), Language, speech, and
social-emotional development of children who are deaf and hard-of-hearing:
The early years. The Volta Review, 100, 181–211. 2000.
C. Yoshinaga-Itano, A.L. Sedey, D.K. Coulter, and A.L. Mehl. Language of
early and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics
1998;102:1161–71.
|